NSFAS CEO Nongogo Gets a Second Chance. Andile Nongogo, the former CEO of the National Student Financial Aid Scheme (NSFAS), has been granted leave to appeal a judgment that initially dismissed his urgent Labour Court case.
This case pertains to the termination of his contract without a disciplinary process. The recent ruling acknowledges the presence of novel issues regarding the interpretation of sections in the employment contract.
On January 6, a judgment handed down by acting judge Maletsatsi Mahalelo dismissed Nongogo urgent application for declaratory relief and reinstatement as CEO of NSFAS. Additionally, the court rejected his application to strike out certain paragraphs of the respondents’ answering affidavit.
The application for leave to appeal was filed in a timely manner, with the NSFAS board participating in the proceedings. Various grounds of appeal were presented, although specifics were not listed in the judgment. However, it was noted that the respondents contested these grounds, considering them meritless.
Threshold for Leave to Appeal
Leave to appeal is only granted if there are reasonable prospects of success, with compelling reasons supporting the need for an appeal. The existence of conflicting judgments on the matter under consideration also influences this decision.
The ruling highlighted a conflict between Nongogo employment contract and the NSFAS disciplinary code. While the code outlined procedures for disciplinary actions, it did not clearly address situations involving the CEO. This discrepancy raised questions regarding the applicability of the disciplinary policy to Nongogo position.
The disciplinary policy permitted representation by a union representative or fellow employee, excluding external legal representation. However, Nongogo asserted his right to legal representation, indicating that he was not subject to the disciplinary policy’s limitations. This further complicated the disciplinary process and highlighted the unique nature of Nongogo position within NSFAS.
The recent ruling granting leave to appeal signifies a potential turning point for Andile Nongogo in his dispute with NSFAS. The conflict between his employment contract and the disciplinary code underscores the complexities of addressing misconduct allegations against high-ranking officials within organizations.
As Nongogo continues to pursue justice, the outcome of his appeal will likely have significant implications for both him and NSFAS.